Nov 9, 2025
Kenya’s 2012 discovery of oil reserves in Northern Kenya and the subsequent establishment of a Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF) mark a pivotal moment in the country’s fiscal and economic trajectory. As global commodity markets remain volatile and debt servicing pressures intensify, the need for structured, transparent, and forward-looking management of oil revenues has never been more urgent. Sovereign wealth funds are used globally to stabilize economies and finance strategic development. Sovereign funds offer countries like Kenya a unique opportunity to transform finite natural resources into long-term prosperity. Yet, despite its significance, Kenya’s SWF remains under-explored in public discourse. This topical aims to demystify the fund’s structure, legal framework, and macroeconomic rationale, while benchmarking it against global and Sub-Saharan African peers. With rising public interest in fiscal accountability and intergenerational equity, understanding how Kenya’s oil wealth is managed is essential for investors, policymakers, and citizens alike.
We will focus on unpacking the legal and institutional architecture of Kenya’s SWF, its revenue allocation mechanisms, and its potential role in stabilizing the economy and financing development. We aim to equip stakeholders with the insights needed to evaluate the fund’s effectiveness, especially considering Kenya’s debt dynamics, infrastructure needs, and Vision 2030 ambitions. As such, we shall cover;
Section I: Introduction to Sovereign Wealth Funds
A Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF) is an investment fund that is owned by the state. Sovereign Wealth Funds invest in stocks, bonds, real estate, commodities and alternative investments such as private equity and hedge funds. Sovereign Wealth Funds are often funded by a country’s surplus revenue and financial reserves. Additionally, they can be capitalized through natural resource revenues such as minerals, oil and gas, proceeds from privatization of state-owned entities, pension contributions and revenue from other state assets.
Sovereign Wealth Funds are classified into:
Countries set up Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) for various reasons, including:
Section II: Kenya’s Proposed Sovereign Oil- Backed Wealth Fund
In October 2025, the National Treasury of Kenya published the Draft Kenya Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF) Bill, 2025. The 2025 bill marks the second time Kenya proposed an investment fund, ten years after The National Sovereign Wealth Fund Bill, 2014. The proposed 2014 SWF included mixed Commodity and Non-commodity fund consisting of the Stabilization Fund, the Infrastructure and Development Fund and the Future Generations Fund. The 2014 Bill however did not go through because the bill intended to use revenue from discovered oil fields in Northern Kenya and coal deposits in the Coast that did not materialize. The table below shows the difference and similarities in features of the 2014 and 2025 proposed SWF Bills:
|
Cytonn Report: A Comparison of Kenya’s 2014 and 2025 Proposed Sovereign Wealth Funds |
||
|
|
The 2014 Proposed SWF |
The 2025 Proposed SWF |
|
Sources of Funds |
Capital from privatization proceeds, dividends from state corporations, oil, gas, and mineral revenues due to the national government, and other natural resource income |
Revenue from upstream petroleum production and revenue from mining, licenses and mining leases. |
|
Components of the Fund |
Stabilization Fund, the Infrastructure and Development Fund and the Future Generations Fund |
Stabilization Fund, the Strategic Infrastructure Investment Fund and the Future Generation (Urithi) Fund |
|
Purpose of the Fund |
Build national savings, stabilize the economy from excess volatility in revenues or exports, diversify from non-renewable exports, support development, manage liquidity, and promote long-term growth |
Cushion the national government from revenue shocks, finance strategic infrastructure, and build savings for future generations beyond resource depletion |
|
Board Composition |
The President, Cabinet Secretaries responsible for National Treasury, Mining, Energy and Petroleum, the Attorney General, the chairperson and secretary to the Board |
Chairperson appointed by the President, the Principal Secretary to the National Treasury, the Governor of the Central Bank, four other independent persons and the Chief Executive Officer |
Source: National Treasury
The Kenya Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF) Bill, 2025 will be funded through revenue from mining and petroleum. The Sovereign Wealth Fund will receive petroleum-related income including the national government’s share of profit from upstream petroleum operations, excluding the share entitled to specific government entities as detailed in the Petroleum Act, 2019, all royalties, bonus payments triggered by production or price thresholds, earnings from government participation in petroleum ventures, and proceeds from the sale or transfer of petroleum interests held by the government. Key to note, Upstream Petroleum Operations involve all or any of the operations related to the exploration, development, production, separation and treatment, storage and transportation of petroleum up to the agreed delivery point. Mining-related contributions to the Sovereign Wealth Fund include royalties payable to the national government, fees from the granting or assignment of mining rights, earnings from the government’s direct or indirect stake in mineral operations and proceeds from the divestment of government-held mining interests.
The Kenya Sovereign Wealth Fund Board shall provide guidance and oversight of the fund. The fund will have investment managers appointed by the Board. Alternatively, the Central Bank of Kenya (CBK), may also be appointed as the investment fund manager. The CBK will act as custodian of the fund and therefore will be responsible for holding and safeguarding the fund's assets, monitoring its performance, and ensuring compliance with regulations. The Fund is prohibited from investing in high-risk financial instruments such as speculative derivatives, non-listed real estate, private equity ventures, artwork, and commodity markets. The 2025 Sovereign Wealth Fund will be divided into three components comprising:
In Kenya, the framework for Sovereign Wealth Funds is anchored by the Public Finance Management Act. The Act provides a legal framework for fiscal discipline, transparency, and accountability. It outlines how funds must be administered, reported, and integrated into the national budget process, including requirements for financial statements, cash flow planning, and withdrawal ceilings aligned with fiscal responsibility principles. By integrating the Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF) into the national budget process and enforcing adherence to fiscal responsibility principles, the Act provides essential governance that safeguards public resources and ensures surplus revenues, especially from non-renewable sources are managed prudently, invested strategically, and used to promote long-term economic stability, development, and intergenerational equity.
The proposed oil -backed SWF will also be regulated by the Petroleum Act, 2019, because the fund will be backed by oil revenues. This Act guides how petroleum (oil and gas) is handled in Kenya from finding it, making contracts, and extracting it, to stopping operations when needed. It also makes sure these activities follow the Constitution. The law covers every stage of petroleum operations: the early stage (exploration and drilling), the middle stage (transport and storage), and the final stage (refining and selling). It also includes rules for anything else related to petroleum that helps these processes run smoothly. The Act will ensure that revenues from upstream petroleum operations such as profit shares, royalties, and fees are legally defined, collected by the Kenya Revenue Authority, and directed into the Sovereign Wealth Fund. This guarantees transparent management of oil and gas income to support long-term development, economic stability, and intergenerational equity.
Revenues from minerals will also fund the SWF. Accordingly, the Mining Act, 2016 will also serve to regulate the fund. The Mining Act is being used in the establishment of the Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF) to ensure that revenues from mineral resources are legally directed into the Fund. The amended Section 186 mandates that all fees, charges, and specific royalties from mining operations be collected by the KRA and remitted to the SWF. This legal provision guarantees that income from mining especially from royalties under Section 183(5)(a) is systematically captured and channeled into the Fund, where it can be transparently managed to support long-term national development, economic stability, and intergenerational equity.
The Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF), as proposed in the Draft Sovereign Wealth Fund Bill 2025, will be structured to address three primary objectives: macroeconomic stabilization, strategic investment, and intergenerational savings. These components will collectively enhance Kenya’s fiscal resilience, accelerate infrastructure-led growth, and safeguard national wealth for future generations.
The fund will act as a financial cushion for the national government, helping to absorb the impact of volatile resource revenues or unexpected macroeconomic shocks such as global recessions or commodity price crashes. The Stabilization Component of the SWF will serve as a counter-cyclical buffer, enabling the government to manage revenue volatility arising from fluctuations in global commodity prices and external macroeconomic shocks. By accumulating surplus revenues during commodity booms, the Fund will allow the government to maintain fiscal continuity during downturns, thereby reducing the need for abrupt expenditure cuts or emergency borrowing. This will support exchange rate stability, preserve investor confidence, and enhance the country’s ability to absorb external shocks without compromising development priorities.
Kenya’s extractive sector, particularly petroleum and mineral resources, will continue to play a growing role in GDP contribution. In FY’2024, the mining sector contributed Kshs 96.3 bn to Kenya’s GDP, marking a 9.2% decline from the Kshs 106.1 bn recorded in FY’2023. The sector accounted for 0.7% of the country’s GDP in FY’2024, consistent with its contribution in the previous year. Additionally, the revenue generated from the mining sector in FY’2024 amounted to Kshs 223.6 bn, with the mining licenses contributing the most by Kshs 154.2 bn. In Q2’2025, the mining sector’s contribution to GDP rose by 16.5% to Kshs 29.0 bn, accounting for 1.0% of the total GDP, up from Kshs 24.9 bn in Q1’2025 and an 8.1% increase from Kshs 26.8 bn in Q2’2024. The annual declining contribution of the mining sector to GDP raises concerns about the reliability and sufficiency of mineral revenues as a primary funding source for Kenya’s Sovereign Wealth Fund. If this trend continues, the fund may face challenges in meeting its capitalization targets, especially for the Stabilization and Future Generations components. However, the trend in 2025 is promising, with Q2’2025 showing an 8.1% year-on-year increase in mining output, indicating early signs of recovery and renewed sector momentum. Nonetheless, the sector’s overall contribution to GDP remains modest at just 1.0%, highlighting ongoing concerns about the adequacy of mineral revenues as a reliable funding source for Kenya’s Sovereign Wealth Fund. This underscores the need for diversified revenue streams and robust fiscal planning to ensure the fund’s sustainability. It also highlights the importance of improving mining sector productivity and governance to maximize its potential as a strategic asset.The graph below shows the mining sector’s contribution to GDP over the last 10 years:

Historical trends indicate that petroleum exports have consistently lagged behind imports, contributing to structural trade deficits and exposing the economy to foreign exchange pressures. Over the past ten years, petroleum imports have consistently exceeded the combined value of petroleum exports and re-exports, with the trade gap reaching Kshs 433.3 bn in 2024 and Kshs 119.4 bn in Q2’2025. Kenya’s petroleum exports rose significantly by 185.9% to Kshs 142.3 bn in FY’2024 from Kshs 49.8 bn in FY’2023, while the value of petroleum imports declined by 8.1% to Kshs 575.5 bn from Kshs 626.4 bn over the same period. Notably, the value of petroleum exports rose by 8.4% in Q2’2025 to Kshs 3.4 bn, up from Kshs 3.1 bn in Q1’2025. However, this still reflects a 4.4% year-on-year decline compared to the Kshs 3.6 bn recorded in Q2’2024, signalling persistent volatility in export performance despite the quarterly improvement. Despite the quarter-on-quarter and the 2024 year-on-year improvement, the sector remains a net deficit on foreign exchange.
Kenya’s reliance on petroleum revenues in a sector where Kenya remains a net importer highlights a key vulnerability for the proposed SWF. While the 2024 and Q2’2025 surge in exports is promising, the persistent trade deficit underscores the volatility and uncertainty of depending on oil as a stable funding source. This risk is amplified by the precedent of the 2014 proposed SWF, which aimed to channel revenues from Turkana’s oil discoveries into national development but ultimately stalled due to political, logistical, and commercial setbacks. For the SWF to be viable and resilient, Kenya must diversify its revenue base and ensure that petroleum sector reforms are fully implemented and commercially sustainable. The graph below shows the value of Kenya’s petroleum imports and exports over the last 10 years:

Source: KNBS Economic Survey, Quarterly BoP
The fund will provide financing for high-priority infrastructure projects that drive inclusive and sustainable economic growth across the country. The Strategic Investment Component of the SWF will be structured to reduce Kenya’s dependence on debt-financed development by allocating resource revenues toward transformative public investments. Over the past decade, Kenya’s infrastructure pipeline, including roads, energy, ports, and ICT, has expanded significantly, but largely through external debt. While these projects have supported GDP growth, they have also contributed to rising debt service obligations and fiscal strain. For instance, in FY’2023/2024 the total domestic came in at Kshs 801.2 bn, increasing by 0.5% from Kshs 797.1 bn in FY’2022/2023 while the external debt servicing cost increased by 87.9% to Kshs 756.0 bn from Kshs 402.4 bn in FY’2024/2025. The cumulative debt servicing cost remains elevated at Kshs 1,559.9 bn in FY’2024/2025, a 0.2% increase from Kshs 1,557.1 bn in FY’2023/2024. The SWF is expected to mitigate this by offering a domestic capital pool for catalytic investments aligned with Vision 2030 and the Bottom-Up Economic Transformation Agenda (BETA). The graph below shows the debt servicing costs over the last ten fiscal years:

Source: The National Treasury, *Provisional
The Fund will prioritize sectors such as in agriculture, transport, housing, energy, water, education and health. These investments will unlock productivity, enhance county-level development, and stimulate job creation. The Fund will also serve as a platform for blended finance and public-private partnerships. However, the viability of this component will depend on the consistency of resource inflows, especially with the mining sector’s declining GDP contribution and the petroleum sector’s persistent trade deficit.
The fund will build a long-term savings base to secure national wealth for future generations, especially after Kenya’s mineral and petroleum resources are depleted. The Future Generations (Urithi) Component of the SWF will be designed to preserve a portion of extractive revenues to last over a long period of time, converting urning short-term resource income into long-term financial savings. This savings mechanism will reflect Kenya’s commitment to intergenerational equity, ensuring that revenue surplus is not consumed but invested for future fiscal stability. The assets accumulated under this component will generate returns that can be deployed to support future budgetary needs. The Urithi Component will serve as both a financial reserve and a strategic hedge against demographic pressures, environmental shocks, and future fiscal demands.
Section III: Comparative Analysis of Sovereign Wealth Funds
Kuwait was the first sovereign state in the world to set up a Sovereign Wealth Fund in 1953 through the Kuwait Investment Authority (KIA). KIA is a commodity- based SWF and ranks fifth largest in the world, with Assets Under Management worth USD 1,002.0 bn. The fund was established following the discovery of oil in the country. The fund’s components include Kuwait General Reserve Fund and the Kuwait Future Generations Fund. The General Reserve Fund acts as Kuwait’s Public Treasury and investment arm, consolidating state revenues to finance government expenditures while enhancing fiscal flexibility and resilience against economic shocks. Beyond stabilization, it strategically invests across key sectors to generate sustainable returns, promote private sector growth, and advance national development and diversification goals. The Future Generations Fund is an intergenerational savings fund that was established in 1976 with 50.0% of its initial funding coming from the General Reserve Fund. The Fund has invested in the global equities markets with holdings in international corporations such as Agricultural Bank of China and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, bonds and alternatives such as private equity, real estate and infrastructure.
Norway’s Government Pension Fund is the largest SWF in the world with an AUM of USD 2,048.0 bn. The fund was established in 1990 to invest the revenue from the Norwegian Petroleum Sector, leveraging the country's economic surpluses and aiming to reduce volatility caused by fluctuating oil prices. The fund is comprised of two separate funds; the Government Pension Fund Global and the Government Pension Fund Norway. The Government Pension Fund Global invests revenue from petroleum in international financial markets, meaning its exposure to risk is largely detached from fluctuations within the Norwegian economy. The fund invests in equities, fixed income, real estate and infrastructure. This global diversification helps shield the fund from domestic economic shocks and enhances long-term financial stability. Conversely, the Government Pension Fund Norway is restricted to domestic investments, with its portfolio limited to assets within Norway, including a cap of 15.0% in any single Norwegian company.
China operates multiple Sovereign Wealth Funds, with the two most prominent being the China Investment Corporation (CIC),with an AUM of USD 1,332.0, and the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE), with an AUM of USD 1,582.0. CIC was capitalized through a process in which the Ministry of Finance issues bonds. The proceeds are used to purchase foreign exchange reserves from the People's Bank of China which are now then allocated those reserves to fund CIC. It was established with the goal of deploying foreign exchange reserves to benefit the state by investing in international assets that offer higher risk and potentially higher returns than traditional government bonds. CIC invests in natural resources, real estate ventures, international listed equities such as Morgan Stanley and private equity. SAFE manages foreign exchange for the People's Bank of China. It oversees several SWFs that channel portions of China's foreign exchange reserves into investment vehicles such as infrastructure, real estate, private equity, and strategic resources.
The United Arab Emirates has several SWFs including the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) and The Investment Corporation of Dubai (ICD). Both are primarily funded by revenues from oil and gas exports. ADIA focuses on long-term global investments across a wide range of asset classes, including stocks, government bonds, real estate, private equity, and infrastructure, aiming to preserve and grow the nation’s wealth for future generations. ICD, on the other hand, plays a more strategic role in supporting Dubai’s economic development by investing in key sectors such as finance, transport, energy, and hospitality, aligning closely with the emirate’s growth agenda.
Kenya’s proposed 2025 Sovereign Wealth Fund aligns with global SWFs in its objectives of economic stabilization and long-term savings, but differs in scale, domestic investment orientation, and governance structure. The following analysis compares Kenya’s fund with select leading international counterparts across four key dimensions:
Kenya’s SWF will be funded primarily through revenues from petroleum and mineral resources, supplemented by other government allocations. China’s CIC was capitalized via Ministry of Finance bond issuance, which purchased foreign exchange reserves from the central bank. Kuwait and the UAE fund their SWFs through surplus oil revenues, with Kuwait’s KIA and Abu Dhabi’s ADIA benefiting from decades of resource-based accumulation. Norway’s GPFG is financed by petroleum taxes, dividends from state-owned enterprises, and licensing fees, channeling oil wealth into long-term savings.
Kenya’s fund is designed to stabilize the economy against resource revenue volatility, finance strategic infrastructure, and save for future generations. China’s SWFs aim to diversify foreign exchange reserves and pursue higher-risk, higher-return investments abroad. Kuwait and Norway emphasize fiscal stabilization and intergenerational savings, with Kuwait also supporting national development goals. The UAE’s ADIA focuses on preserving wealth and ensuring long-term financial sustainability for future generations.
Kenya’s SWF will invest primarily in high-rated foreign sovereign bonds, foreign currency deposits with other central and settlement banks, multilateral-backed securities, and foreign currency instruments. The fund also prohibits investments in securities listed on the Nairobi Securities Exchange. China’s CIC and SAFE invest globally across equities, private equity, real estate, and strategic sectors, with no strict domestic restrictions. Kuwait and the UAE also maintain globally diversified portfolios, though Kuwait’s GRF supports domestic development as well. Norway’s GPFG is restricted to international investments only, avoiding domestic markets to prevent economic distortion and applying strict ethical guidelines. Additionally, Norway’s GPFG has ethical restrictions on investments.
Kenya’s fund will be managed under a legal framework overseen by the National Treasury, with investments managed by either independent fund managers or the Central Bank of Kenya. China’s CIC operates independently as a state-owned entity, while SAFE functions as a subsidiary of the People’s Bank of China. Kuwait’s KIA and the UAE’s ADIA are autonomous institutions, with KIA reporting to the Ministry of Finance and ADIA maintaining its own investment teams. Norway’s GPFG is managed by Norges Bank Investment Management, a specialized arm of the central bank, combining professional oversight with operational independence.
The graph below shows the top 10 countries’ Sovereign Wealth Funds ranked by Assets Under Management (AUM):

Source: Global SWF
Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) have emerged as vital instruments for economic stabilization, long-term savings, and strategic investment across Sub-Saharan Africa. Countries such as Nigeria, Gabon, Rwanda, and Angola have established SWFs with distinct structures, funding sources, and mandates tailored to their national priorities. These funds reflect diverse approaches from resource-backed stabilization and infrastructure financing to citizen-driven savings models, offering valuable insights into how African economies are leveraging sovereign assets to build resilience, foster development, and secure intergenerational prosperity.
The Nigeria Sovereign Investment Authority (NSIA) manages the Nigeria Sovereign Wealth Fund, funded by surplus oil revenues, with the goal of generating long-term returns and supporting national development. As of December 2024, the fund holds USD 2.4 bn in assets and is structured into three components: the Stabilisation Fund, the Future Generation Fund, and the Nigeria Infrastructure Fund. The Stabilisation Fund is invested in short-term, high-quality fixed income assets to ensure liquidity and meet unexpected government budgetary needs, especially during oil price shocks. Meanwhile, the Future Generation Fund focuses on long-term savings, and the Infrastructure Fund supports development in sectors like agriculture and public projects.
The Angola Sovereign Wealth Fund was established in 2011 to support the country’s economic growth and social development. Angola being one of the largest oil producers in Sub-Saharan Africa, oil revenues finance the fund. Half of its assets are directed toward alternative investments like agriculture, mining, infrastructure, and hospitality within Angola and across Africa. The other half is allocated to global investments in fixed income instruments, equities, and additional alternatives. Up to 7.5% of the fund may be used for social projects in education, healthcare, clean water, energy, and income generation.
Established in 2012, the Agaciro Development Fund (AGDF) is Rwanda’s sovereign wealth fund aimed at promoting self-reliance, economic stability, and long-term development. It invests both locally and internationally, with a portfolio comprising government securities, term deposits and equities. Uniquely, AGDF is funded through voluntary contributions from Rwandans and friends of Rwanda. Recent government transfers of shares in state-owned companies have expanded and diversified the Fund’s holdings. AGDF plays a vital role in shielding Rwanda from external economic shocks and securing prosperity for future generations.
Established in 1998, the Sovereign Wealth Fund of the Gabonese Republic (FSRG) was created to invest oil revenues for the long-term benefit of Gabonese citizens. Managed by the Gabonese Fund for Strategic Investments (FGIS) since 2012, the Fund now operates as a development vehicle aligned with Gabon’s structural economic transformation. FGIS channels investments into renewable energy, water infrastructure, SMEs, urban planning, and key social sectors such as health and education. Its mandate supports the government’s Plan d’Accélération de la Transformation, which seeks to reduce oil dependence, promote local value creation, generate sustainable jobs, and ensure intergenerational prosperity while preserving Gabon’s natural ecosystems.
The following analysis compares Kenya’s fund with select leading Sub-Saharan counterparts across four key dimensions:
Kenya’s SWF will be funded primarily through revenues from petroleum and mineral resources, supplemented by government allocations. This model aligns closely with Nigeria, Angola, and Gabon, whose SWFs are financed by surplus oil revenues. Nigeria’s fund draws from excess crude income, Angola’s from its large oil exports, and Gabon’s from petroleum taxes and royalties. In contrast, Rwanda’s Agaciro Development Fund is uniquely funded through voluntary contributions from citizens, the diaspora, and friends of Rwanda demonstrating a grassroots approach to sovereign savings.
Kenya’s SWF is designed to stabilize the economy against resource revenue volatility, finance strategic infrastructure, and save for future generations. This mirrors the threefold purpose of Nigeria’s SWF, which includes a Stabilisation Fund, Infrastructure Fund, and Future Generation Fund. Angola and Gabon also emphasize economic transformation and social development, with Gabon aligning its fund with national priorities like renewable energy and job creation. Rwanda’s fund, while smaller in scale, focuses on self-reliance, economic resilience, and shielding the country from external shocks, offering a model for public-driven legitimacy.
Kenya’s SWF will invest in high-rated foreign sovereign bonds, foreign currency deposits, and multilateral-backed securities, while prohibiting investments in domestic securities listed on the Nairobi Securities Exchange. This cautious approach is similar to Nigeria’s Stabilization Fund, which prioritizes liquidity and safety. Angola, however, pursue more diversified portfolio where it splits its assets between domestic alternatives and global investments. Rwanda’s fund maintains a balanced portfolio of government securities, term deposits, and equities, both locally and internationally.
Kenya’s proposed Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF) can draw critical lessons from global and Sub-Saharan African peers by prioritizing strong governance, diversified funding, and strategic investment mandates. Leading funds like Norway’s and Kuwait’s demonstrate the importance of clear legal frameworks, offshore investment strategies, and intergenerational savings mechanisms that shield economies from commodity volatility. China’s CIC and UAE’s ADIA highlight the value of leveraging foreign exchange reserves and aligning investments with national development goals. Regionally, Nigeria’s NSIA and Botswana’s Pula Fund underscore the need for transparency, fiscal discipline, and performance-based asset allocation. For Kenya, the key takeaway is that success hinges not just on resource endowment, but on institutional credibility, consistent revenue flows, and a long-term vision that integrates stabilization, infrastructure finance, and wealth preservation.
Section IV: Opportunities and Threats for Kenya
The proposed Sovereign Wealth Fund will mark a key shift in Kenya’s fiscal strategy, transforming volatile extractive revenues into a structured, multi-purpose national asset. Anchored on three components; Stabilization, Strategic Investment, and Future Generations, the Fund will seek to enhance macroeconomic resilience, accelerate infrastructure-led growth, and preserve wealth across generations. However, its success will depend on how effectively Kenya navigates structural risks and capitalizes on emerging fiscal and favourable global conditions.
Opportunities for Kenya Through the Sovereign Wealth Fund
Threats to Kenya’s Sovereign Wealth Fund
Section V: Policy Recommendations and Conclusion
Kenya’s proposed Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF) offers a strategic pathway to fiscal resilience, infrastructure-led growth, and intergenerational wealth preservation. However, its success will depend on disciplined execution, diversified revenue streams, and robust governance. The 2014 SWF Bill stalled due to overreliance on speculative oil and coal revenues that failed to materialize, highlighting the critical risk of anchoring national investment frameworks on uncertain extractive flows. This precedent underscores the need for commercial viability, sector reforms, and ring-fenced revenue mechanisms to avoid political and logistical setbacks. While petroleum exports rose by 185.9% to Kshs 142.3 bn in 2024, the sector remains a net foreign exchange deficit, with imports still at Kshs 575.5 bn. Mining revenues hit Kshs 223.6 bn, yet GDP contribution declined to Kshs 96.3 bn, reinforcing concerns about sustainability. In Q2’2025, the mining sector showed signs of recovery, contributing Kshs 29.0 billion to GDP, an 8.1% year-on-year increase but still accounted for only 1.0% of total output, underscoring the limited fiscal weight of extractives. These trends reveal the fragility of relying solely on extractives to fund the SWF. Kenya must therefore broaden its funding base, incorporating privatization proceeds, state dividends, and fiscal surpluses while institutionalizing transparency, offshore investment discipline, and stakeholder oversight. If these lessons are heeded and reforms sustained, the SWF can evolve into a cornerstone of Kenya’s economic transformation, shielding the budget from shocks, unlocking catalytic investments, and securing prosperity beyond resource depletion.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this publication are those of the writers where particulars are not warranted. This publication is meant for general information only and is not a warranty, representation, advice or solicitation of any nature. Readers are advised in all circumstances to seek the advice of a registered investment advisor.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this publication are those of the writers where particulars are not warranted. This publication, which is in compliance with Section 2 of the Capital Markets Authority Act Cap 485A, is meant for general information only and is not a warranty, representation, advice, or solicitation of any nature. Readers are advised in all circumstances to seek the advice of a registered investment advisor